For enterprise

Automate the delivery lifecycle without lowering the bar.

Most SDLC automation asks an organisation to trade standards for speed, which is why it stalls the moment it meets a real control environment. This does the opposite. The harness is built into your lifecycle, configured to the gates you already enforce, and it puts a stricter automated bar in front of every human review. Proven on one contained initiative, then handed to your teams to run.

Book the call → See how it works

01 / What we build

A delivery harness that belongs to you, inside the lifecycle you already have.

We're not selling you a platform to migrate onto, and we're not asking your teams to work somewhere else. The harness is built into your software development lifecycle, tuned to your stack, your gates, and your controls, and it's yours when it's done.

Specification to merge, automated

Orchestrated agents carrying a change from a written specification through code, tests, review, and deployment, with the stages that need engineering judgement left to engineers on purpose.

Your gates, not ours

The controls you already enforce become the harness's gates. It's configured to your definition of done, not to a vendor's, and a change that doesn't clear them doesn't proceed.

Your evidence trail

Every gate produces an artefact. Acceptance criteria proven in CI rather than declared in a pull request description, which is the form an auditor can actually use.

Your stack, your recipes

Accelerator recipes for common stacks, extended to yours. Above a containerised build and a scripted test wrapper, the language and the tooling are your call.

02 / How the bar holds

Faster and stricter aren't opposites. They're the same investment.

The reason most SDLC automation stalls in a regulated business is that it asks the organisation to accept a lower standard in exchange for speed. This does the reverse: it puts a stricter machine bar in front of every human review, because once the checks are automated they're economically free to run on every change.

Above your review, not instead of it

Nothing about your approval chain is removed. Work arrives at a human reviewer having already passed seven test types and a four-axis review, so review time goes on judgement rather than on catching what a machine should have caught.

Security on every change

Secure-by-default generation, secret scanning, and dependency vetting as properties of how code is produced. SAST, deep SCA, container scanning, DAST, and threat modelling either delivered by us or wired into the tooling you already own.

Findings return as fixes

However a finding is raised, the harness triages it, patches it, and re-runs the gates. Your engineers see what needs a decision. The rest closes itself instead of becoming a ticket queue.

Nothing reaches into your estate

The integration surface is a repository and its CI. Your environments, your access controls, and your audit trail stay where they are. Your code is never used to train models.

03 / How it starts

One contained initiative first, then widen it.

Nobody should roll this across an engineering organisation on a promise, and we wouldn't ask you to. The first engagement is a real piece of work with a real deadline, chosen because it's contained enough to prove the model and important enough to be worth proving.

01Assess the current lifecycle

02Map your gates and controls

03Build the harness around them

04Ship one initiative through it

05Hand it over, and widen

The people who built it train the people who run it.

The engagement ends with your teams operating the harness, not with a support contract. Documentation, runbooks, and the reasoning behind each gate come with it, and we stay reachable for the engineering judgement calls. We'd rather be the reason your delivery organisation improved than the reason it can't function without us.

Typical fit Platform and developer experience groups · New venture and innovation units · Product groups with their own release train · Teams where AI adoption has stalled on governance

04 / What it costs

Sized to the lifecycle, with no minimum term.

Harness engagements are sized on the lifecycle they have to fit, so this is a conversation rather than a price list. What doesn't change is the shape: a fixed price where the scope is defined, time-based where it isn't yet, both agreed before anyone commits, and no minimum term.

The difference from a consultancy engagement is the shape rather than the discount. You're not funding a pyramid, a bench, or an account layer. You're buying a harness that works and a team that can hand it over.

Tell us where delivery is bottlenecked.

Tell us what your lifecycle looks like today and where it slows down, and we'll tell you what a harness around it would take. A 45-minute call, no pitch and no obligation. You leave the call knowing the scope, the timing, and how we'd price it. If we're not the right team for it, we say so.

hello@cercury.ai Everything we do

We earn the next month on the work, not on the lock-in.